How many people have lost their jobs?
According to Barack Obama, 600 thousand Americans have lost their jobs since January. Actually, he's wrong: something like 20 million Americans have lost their jobs since January. It's just that most of them found new jobs. Probably the new jobs generally weren't as good as the ones they lost. And almost certainly, more than 600 thousand of them were unable to find new jobs, because many of the new jobs created were filled by new entrants to the labor force or by people who were already unemployed when the year began.
Like almost everyone else I've ever heard, Senator Obama is making the mistake of using a net job loss figure with language that, if taken in its plain sense, clearly implies he is talking about gross job loss. And it seems to me that gross job loss is the appropriate concept: losing your job is a pretty serious bummer, even if you are able to find a new one after a few months.
There has been a lot of talk about Senator McCain and how he has been saying things that aren't true in order benefit himself politically. It turns out that Senator Obama is also (obviously unintentionally) saying things that aren't true, but in this case they benefit his opponent.
Like almost everyone else I've ever heard, Senator Obama is making the mistake of using a net job loss figure with language that, if taken in its plain sense, clearly implies he is talking about gross job loss. And it seems to me that gross job loss is the appropriate concept: losing your job is a pretty serious bummer, even if you are able to find a new one after a few months.
There has been a lot of talk about Senator McCain and how he has been saying things that aren't true in order benefit himself politically. It turns out that Senator Obama is also (obviously unintentionally) saying things that aren't true, but in this case they benefit his opponent.
Labels: economics, jobs, labor, macroeconomics, politics, unemployment
36 Comments:
Economic Snapshots
Snapshot for September 17, 2008.
Got work?
by Heidi Shierholz
In July, there were 8.8 million unemployed workers actively seeking jobs in the United States, but only 3.4 million job openings, according to data released last week from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In other words, there were an average of 2.6 job seekers for every available job—an increase of over 60% from the low point in the 2000s expansion a year and a half ago, when there were just 1.6 job seekers for every job opening (see chart).1 There are now 5.4 million more job seekers than job openings in this country, meaning that millions of dedicated, productive American workers are experiencing the hardship and insecurity of unemployment with little hope of finding a job. The job openings data represent one more strong indicator of the need for a second stimulus package that is targeted directly at job creation.
Got work?
Has anyone ever looked at what the definition of "employment" is? I didn't know how grim it was until an economist told me.
Most people think employment is someone who has a full time job and works at least 40 hours a week... way off!
In the US the unemployment statistic is someone who has actively looked for work in the last 4 weeks:
How Govt measures Unemployment
In Australia, you're classified as employed if you've worked at an hour in the previous week.
Unemployment in Australia
Are those 20m job separations or layoffs? Presumably at least some people who quit their old jobs are happier in their new ones.
20 million is my "ball park figure" for layoffs based on extrapolating the "gross job losses" figure from the Business Employment Dynamics data. None of the data for 2008 have been released yet, but gross job losses in 2007 were running at about 7400 per quarter. On the premise that the rate in 2008 was higher, I used 8000 as a round figure and multiplied by 3 (although the 3rd quarter isn't quite over). That gives 24,000. Then I rounded down to 20,000, figuring that maybe 4,000 of the job losses weren't actually layoffs. (A job loss could be someone quitting without being replaced.) Now that I'm looking at the definitions from CES, it's also possible my figure is too low, because if someone is laid off from one position while someone else is hired for a different position in the same establishment, it looks like that would not count as a job loss.
"20 million is my "ball park figure" for layoffs"
You are failing to net out baseline turnover - which would exist even in a "good" employment year.
Using your metric, even the best year of the 90's would likely show gross job losses in the high millions.
That is because you are measuring *separations* - which occur in the millions even in the best of times.
I think the underlying point about underemployment is very valid but the 20 million figure is extremely inaccurate/deceptive.
I'm not measuring "separations"; I'm measuring "gross job losses" (extrapolating the figure of that name from the BED data). As best I can determine, they take the change in employment at each establishment and add them up. The only issue is what proportion of quitters are replaced within the quarter. I'm assuming that most of them are. But I rounded down as a rough guess to account for those that aren't replaced.
I'll repeat my main point:
You are failing to net out baseline turnover - which would exist even in a "good" employment year.
Using your metric, even the best year of the 90's would likely show gross job losses in the high millions.
I'm not sure what you mean by
"baseline turnover." If you're talking about people who quit one job and go to another one, then you're criticism is only valid to the extent that replacing quitters takes longer than to the end of the quarter (or that quitters are not replaced at all). If someone quits and then is replaced within the quarter, the statistic will show no job loss, because the head count for that establishment at the end of the quarter will be the same as the head count at the beginning of the quarter. Your criticism would clearly apply if I were measuring "separations," but I'm not.
If by "baseline turnover" you mean people who are laid off from one job and then find another one, then of course I don't take that into account: that's my whole point. These people have "lost their jobs," most of them have experienced at least a short spell of unemployment, and they should be counted in the number of people who have lost their jobs.
It's true that my figure would show a lot of job losses during the 90s, because there were in fact a lot of job losses during the 90s. I imagine that, in certain industries and occupations, and in certain parts of the country, jobs loss was a serious problem even then. The major difference is that the job market as a whole was strong, so it was easier for most people to find a new job (and a reasonably good one) than it is today. (I think the extent of the contrast has been exaggerated, though. Even in the 90s, losing your job was bad news.)
So in the 1990s, although job loss was high, it usually wasn't such a big deal. Maybe say 15 million people lost their jobs in 9 months, but it wasn't painful enough to be an issue. Today, losing your job is very bad news, because finding a new one is a major struggle, and because the likelihood of finding a new one as good as the old one is low in most cases.
I stand behind my point that around 20 million people have lost their jobs. We don't really know how painful the job losses were. We know that most of them found new jobs, but we don't know how difficult it was or how good the new jobs were compared to the old ones. We do know that average unemployment duration has been longer than usual, so that's one indicator that a large fraction of these job losses were difficult for the people who experienced them.
I'll grant you that gross job losses by itself may not be the best statistic to describe the state of the job market, but neither is net job losses. I would want to know both numbers, among numerous others.
knzn,
Your estimate of 20 million for gross job losses is too low, by at least a factor of 2. Using the CPS, I calculate that 46.9 million workers left employment in 2008.
A detailed analysis is here:
http://chrisnekarda.com/2008/09/gross-flows-on-the-campaign-trail/
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,a片,情趣用品
免費A片,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛
情色文學,色情A片,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,言情小說,愛情小說,AV片,A漫,AVDVD,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,成人交友,成人電影,成人貼圖,成人小說,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人遊戲,愛情公寓,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色小說,成人論壇
美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,視訊,免費視訊,美女交友,成人交友,聊天室交友,微風論壇,微風成人,情色貼圖,色情,微風,聊天室尋夢園,交友,視訊交友,視訊聊天,視訊辣妹,一夜情
A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,.18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人網站,成人圖片,AV女優,成人光碟,色情,色情影片,免費A片下載,SEX,AV,色情網站,本土自拍,性愛,成人影片,情色文學,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人貼圖
成人視訊交友聊天室成人視訊交友聊天室成人視訊交友聊天室成人視訊交友聊天室成人視訊交友聊天室成人視訊交友聊天室成人視訊交友聊天室成人視訊交友聊天室視訊交友網視訊交友網視訊交友網視訊交友網視訊交友網視訊交友網視訊交友網視訊交友網視訊交友網視訊交友網美女視訊交友網美女視訊交友網美女視訊交友網美女視訊交友網美女視訊交友網美女視訊交友網美女視訊交友網美女視訊交友網美女視訊交友網美女視訊交友網辣妹視訊交友網辣妹視訊交友網辣妹視訊交友網辣妹視訊交友網辣妹視訊交友網辣妹視訊交友網辣妹視訊交友網辣妹視訊交友網辣妹視訊交友網辣妹視訊交友網a片下載080苗栗人聊天室尋夢園聊天室080免費視訊聊天室美女交友視訊聊天室辣妹視訊 - 免費聊天室日本av女優無碼dvd日本AV女優影音娛樂網色情電影分享區色情電影分享區色情電影分享區洪爺色情電影洪爺色情電影洪爺色情電影洪爺色情電影洪爺色情電影洪爺色情電影洪爺色情電影洪爺色情電影洪爺色情電影洪爺色情電影女學生自拍電影貼片女學生自拍電影貼片aa片免費看微風論壇080哈啦聊天室6k聊天室成人聊天室上班族捷克論壇大眾論壇plus論壇080視訊聊天室520視訊聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族 a片a片影片免費情色影片免費a片觀看小弟第貼影片區免費av影片免費h影片試看 H漫 - 卡通美女短片小魔女貼影片免費影片觀賞無碼a片網美女pc交友相簿美女交友-哈啦聊天室中文a片線上試看免費電影下載區免費試看a短片免費卡通aa片觀看女優影片無碼直播免費性感a片試看日本AV女優影音娛樂網日本av女優無碼dvd辣妹視訊 - 免費聊天室美女交友視訊聊天室080免費視訊聊天室尋夢園聊天室080苗栗人聊天室a片下載日本免費視訊美女免費視訊聊天
(法新社a倫敦二B十WE四日電) 「情色二零零七」情趣產品大產自二十三日起在倫敦的肯色情影片辛頓奧林匹亞展覽館舉行,倫敦成人影片人擺脫對性的保守態度踴躍參觀,許多穿皮衣與塑膠緊身衣的成人電影好色之徒擠進這項世界規模最大的成人生活展,估計三天展期可吸引八萬多好奇民眾參觀。
活動計情色畫負責人米里根承諾:「A片要搞浪漫、誘惑人、玩虐待,你渴望的我們都有。」
他說:「時髦的設計與華麗女裝,從吊飾到束腹到真人大情色電影小的雕塑a片,是我們由今年展出的數千件產品精選av出的一部分,參展產品還包括時尚服飾、貼身女用內在美av女優、鞋子、珠寶、玩具、影片、藝術、圖書及遊戲,更不要說性愛色情輔具及AV女優馬術裝備。」
參觀民眾AV遊覽兩百五十多個攤位,有成人電影性感服裝、A片下載玩具及情色食品,迎色情合各種品味。
大舞台上表演的是美國情色電影野蠻搖滾歌手瑪莉蓮曼森的前妻─全世界頭牌脫衣舞孃黛塔范提思,這是她今年在英國唯一一場表演。
以情色一成人影片九四零年代風格演出的黛塔范提思表演性感的天堂鳥、旋轉木馬及羽扇等舞蹈。
a片參展攤位成人網站有的推廣情a片下載趣用品,有的公開展示人體藝術成人網站和人體雕塑,也有情色藝術家工會成員提供建議。
We possess professional anime cosplay costumes with an abundant designing strength. High quality Black Butler Cosplay and Anime Cosplay Costume On Sale. You can dress naruto cosplay up for Cosplay show. Cheap Cosplay will feature an array of gently used Halloween Cosplay Costumes and accessories in adult and children’s sizes. Individuals interested in donating Wholesale Costume can drop them off. Wright Elementary through the day of the sale. A collection of Japanese School Uniform,cosplay naruto,Final Fantasy Cosplay,Bleach Cosplay,Kingdom Hearts Cosplay is hot sale now.
桃園當鋪.桃園汽車借款.中壢環球當鋪
高雄當鋪.高雄汽車借款.統一當鋪
高雄汽車借款.高雄當鋪.川勝當鋪
嘉義汽車借款.嘉義當鋪.世界當鋪
Took me awhile to read all the comments, but I really love the article. It proved to be very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! cameraboysIt's always nice when you can not only be informed, but also engagedliveprivates! I'm sure you had fun writing this maturescam.comarticle.
Thanks for the articles. It's so can be increased my knowlegde about this..
Indonesia Siap Bersaing di SERP | Rumah Mungil Yang Sehat
welcome to cam girls site, become a sex cam model . i am a boss of streamate and livejasmin .
Loni felt like her heart was being torn apart every time she looked at little Jay. It was terrible knowing that his parents had been killed and she couldn't ,live gay webcam chat,tell him when it was obvious he was desperate gay cam chatto know their condition.
In July, there were 8.8 million unemployed workers actively seeking jobs in the United States, but only 3.4 million job openings, according to data released last week from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In other words, there were an average of 2.6 job seekers for every available job—an inc
徵信 徵信社 徵信公司
徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司
徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司
徵信 徵信社 徵信公司
徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司
徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司 徵信 徵信社 徵信公司
Nice to be visiting your blog again, it has been months for me. Well this article that I've been waited for so long. I need this article to complete my assignment in the college, and it has same topic with your article. Thanks, great shart
One style of Converse boots is the Bosey. Chaussures Converse
This boot contains a soft leather upper portion along with shearling lining to keep the feet nice and warm in the wintertime
Just wanted to let you know... your web site looks really good in firefox.
Another topic which highly discussed.. the unemployed. But where can true facts be found?? Is the Gov't lying to us?
Hey, Great post **
Thank you for sharing to us.there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post.I would like to join your blog anyway so please continue sharing with us
There are may person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post,
Really great post, Thank you for sharing This knowledge.Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same level of content as you, the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up!
I don't think you can deny that Obama has been a very bad this for the economy and for jobs in general. He's too anti-business which means hurts job growth.
Això és realment interessant, ets un blogger molt hàbil. M'he unit a la seva alimentació i esperem que busquen més del seu missatge meravellós. A més, he compartit el seu lloc en els meus xarxes socials !
I really enjoy reding your posts as I learn a lot from them. I also broaden my thinking as far as what I can use and do with things
I really enjoy reding your posts as I learn a lot from them. I also broaden my thinking as far as what I can use and do with things
there are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your postThis is really interesting,
It makes me feel so surprise.I never know there is such a wonderful place that I can find what I need,
air jordan 1
paul george shoes
off white jordan 1
kyrie 4
kyrie 4 shoes
curry 7 shoes
birkin bag
golden goose sneakers
curry 7
yeezy
Post a Comment
<< Home