Monday, November 10, 2008

GM is not Lehman

I’m generally in favor of bailing out the US auto industry, mostly because such a bailout would be a relatively inexpensive form of fiscal stimulus. Compare the cost of bailing out the auto industry to the cost of trying to replace the lost jobs by means of government hiring. (There will be multiplier effects on both sides of the equation, which should roughly balance out.) Bailing out the auto makers, by just lending to them at below-market interest rates, is clearly cheaper. In fact, the interest rates should still represent a positive, or at least neutral, spread to Treasury rates, so there need not be any cost at all to the bailout unless the bailees eventually do default.

However, comparisons between GM and Lehman Bros. are overblown. The lost jobs at GM could be replaced by means of a fiscal stimulus, albeit an expensive one; the financial impact of the Lehman bankruptcy cannot be undone, though the government is doing its best to mitigate that impact.

An industrial company is simply not the same as a financial company. Yes, the auto companies do have creditors, and those creditors will lose out if the auto companies go bankrupt, and this may have significant adverse indirect effects. And yes, such bankruptcies will somewhat reduce confidence in US industrial companies in general and make it a bit harder (though probably not a lot harder) for them to obtain financing.

But a financial company doesn’t just have creditors, it’s in the business of having creditors. The indirect impact of a major failure – by forcing creditors, and creditors of creditors, and so on, to deleverage themselves – is huge. And a loss of confidence in financial companies doesn’t just make it harder for them to find financing; it instigates a chain reaction of additional deleveraging on a grand scale. And as we have seen, this can make it impossible for many companies (and households) to find financing at all, and such tightening of credit can result in many more job losses than the collapse of a few large industrial companies.

So, yes, I do support an auto industry bailout. But let’s not allow the auto companies to bamboozle us by claiming that their failure would be as disastrous as the Lehman failure. The public should not consider itself to be in a terribly bad negotiating position with respect to the auto industry. Bail them out, but bail them out on our terms, not theirs.

23 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Remember when Circuit City was a favorite in "Good to Great" by Jim Collins? Remember when we thought being big like GM gave you clout with customers and vendors to produce long-term returns (Michael Porter's 5 Forces Model)? It's time we recognize that the old approach to management doesn't work in a rapidly shifting competitive world. There are winners in today's market, but they follow a different approach. Read more at http://www.ThePhoenixPrinciple.com

Mon Nov 10, 04:18:00 PM EST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think that they should give/lend the automobile industry funds to retool and make fuel efficient cars and electric cars. Isn't that Obama's idea? I like it!
But how much more of a deficit can we go into? According to an IMF report, the US needs an improvement in its (government budget) primary balance of 7 percent of GDP in order to be fiscally sustainable. My back of the envelope calculations say that this is equivalent to an increase in taxes and/or other government revenues of 20% with no change in expenditures, or a significant decrease in expenditures. How can this be done, while at the same time stimulating the economy?
I wouldn't want to be in Obama's shoes right now, although I'm very pleased that he got elected. The politics and economics of this total mess are rather scary.

Mon Nov 10, 09:52:00 PM EST  
Blogger knzn said...

I don't think the concept of fiscal sustainability applies during a potentially deflationary recession. The deficits that the US ran during the 30s and 40s were certainly not sustainable by the standards the IMF would apply today, and yet the subsequent decades were among the most prosperous in US history, and the debt-to-GDP ratio fell to a normal level.

If the economy has slack resources, we can spend a virtually infinite amount (as we did on World War II), and it has no real resource cost. The cost exists only in financial statements. And that cost is largely an illusion: the Chinese authorities are willing to accept tiny returns on their dollar assets, while future US taxpayers will be earning much higher returns and won't have much trouble paying out if it ever comes to that.

And when the Treasury bill interest rate is at zero (as it roughly is now, and will almost certainly be precisely in the future), the Fed has essentially unlimited ability to monetize the fiscal deficit, since any amount of money it creates cannot lower the interest rate further. In that case, there is not even a financial cost to the deficit; you just print money to cover it, and it doesn't cause inflation because nobody spends it. (If it did cause inflation, that would be a sign that the recession was over, and you could withdraw the fiscal stimulus.)

Mon Nov 10, 11:45:00 PM EST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

knzn, from a policy standpoint you may favor bailing out GM/F/Chrysler, which part(s) of the capital structure are hurt? You claim it would be a relatively cheap form of fiscal stimulus.

But the bailouts' winners and losers morph within the capital strcture with each new rescue. Consider:

Bear: senior debtholders, trading counterparties, preferred holders, bailed out. Common destroyed.

FNM and FRE: senior and sub debtholders bailed out, preferred and common destroyed.

WM: depositors and FDIC bailed out; sr, sub, pfd and common destroyed.

I could continue with BAC/CFC, BAC/MER, WB/WFC, or even Buffett/GS.

My point is that an Obama GM bailout could be as harsh for markets as a guarantee of UAW employees' pensions, a "golden share" of control in exchange for debtor-in-possession financing, and zero for GM and GMAC creditors, senior on down. What would GMAC bondholders, to name a group, do in that case? A lawsuit against the government?

Thoughts are springing forth.... Could the government take a >79.9% stake and consolidate, since the assets are less than liabilities? Hhmm..

I'm still thinking the UAW guarantee is the cleverest, as the contract is with the union, not GM, so GM can be allowed to fail without major political repercussions. Suppliers who fail can be bailed out with a TARP v2, or with lavish "job re-training programs."

Tue Nov 11, 02:31:00 AM EST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks knzn for the macroeconomics insights. You've convinced me. As for the auto companies, I do think they need to be helped in retooling, but the gov't can't get itself in a situation where it has to permanently support them, particularly if people are going to drive fewer cars.
I support a big infrastructure stimulus as the infrastructure is crumpling. In particular, this is time to invest in public transit. Some of the auto workers could be retrained to move from making autos to working in public works and public transit. Particularly the younger ones, and they will the first to be laid off.
The government could also consider buying up some of that cheap and unused housing for public housing.

Tue Nov 11, 08:27:00 AM EST  
Blogger Denis Drew said...

If the $25 billion auto bailout loan goes to retooling to build almost fuel-free cars like the Volt, the savings on foreign oil purchases alone could pay back many multiples of the principle -- ever year! -- leaving T. Boone Pickens' program for freedom from foreign oil dependence in GM's dust.

Free upgrade to plug-in hybrid?

Reported by Tom Krishner, AP Auto Writer Monday, July 21, 2008: ..."lithium-ion battery packs needed to power even a small car now cost in excess of $10,000..."

A couple of years ago, I came up with the fun dollar-savings equation that: if America needed only half as much imported oil (meaning 5 million bbl/day then) and if we needed to pay only half the price ($30/bbl then) due to said lowered demand, then, we could save $165 billion a year (by spending only 5,000,000 bbl/day X 365 days X $30 instead of 10,000,000 bbl/day X 365 days X $60 = a saving of $164,250,000,000/year)...

...or, exactly enough to subsidize buidling the 16.5 million cars and trucks we manufacture every year as LITHIUM, PLUG-IN hybrids -- at $10,000 per vehicle!

Now, with oil recently approaching the $150/bbl range, we could be shipping $500 billion more a year overseas; potentially justifying any form of subisidy for the manufacture of lithium plug-in hybrids.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/07/21/financial/f184312D31.DTL&type=autos
******************

For 30 years it has been known that building lithium ion batteries with silicon wires (instead of carbon wires) could yield ten times the power holding ability but, because silicon wires expanded and contracted too much as they cycled, they quickly destroyed themselves. The development of silicon nano wires – about a thousandth of the width of a sheet of paper -- has solved that drawback -- while potentially making lithium ion batteries more stable (safer) at the same time!

Near term, only the anode side of the batteries will be manufactured with nano wires, yielding the quadruple jump (up powering GM’s Volt to go 160 miles on one charge instead of 40?). Long term, manufacturing the cathode side with silicon nano wires is expected to reach the ten multiple target (introducing hybrid, long distant trucks?).

http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2008/january9/nanowire-010908.html

Tue Nov 11, 09:08:00 AM EST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bailing out GM has nothing to do with jobs. Let me say that again, bailing out GM will not save jobs. GM has to stop the bleeding whether it gets gov't money or not, the only way to do that is to shrink to fit its market. If GM goes bankrupt it will have to shrink to fit, if it gets a bail-out it will have to shrink to fit. A gov't bail-out is only bailing out shareholders and creditors, not workers. Knzn, you should know better.

Tue Nov 11, 09:12:00 AM EST  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

araç sorgulama
sorgulama
ehliyet
açıköğretim
bağkur sorgulama
ssk sorgulama
emekli sandığı
cinsellik
radyo dinle
korku
evlilik
hikaye
gazeteler
ilan
ssk
ehliyet sınav sonuçları
iş ilanları
bağkur
gazete oku

Mon Jan 18, 10:39:00 AM EST  
Blogger sara chen said...

As with women’s leggings, these seem to be designed to be layered with other clothing items, which do offer a little bit of modesty. Well, I’m not sure this is a trend that will take on, but if it does it’s certain to winter a whole new set of over-exposure solutions as we’ve seen with the camel toe! Moncler men Jackets , Leggings have been hot for women over the past few seasons, but I didn’t think they might extend to the other gender, at least not outside of sporting events that require down jackes, did you?
Stars are always exposed to dress sexy, but in the winter cold, like the design of Moncler women Jackets to help them wear down the United States and also warm. By the star like Moncler Show, which is a very strong brand.Do you even concern about what they are wearing or using? Do you know that which jacket brand stars love most? The answer is Moncler shop online

Sun Nov 07, 07:50:00 AM EST  
Blogger weddingdresses said...

I Know Power Balance bracelet is very popular all over the world.
And so many wholesalers buy Power Balanceand silly bandz from us for Christmas' gifts.
Free shipping! brandshoes2trade.com

I just have this energy level that I've never had before. The only thing that's changed is I've started wearing my Power Balance and nike running shoes

Fri Dec 03, 04:21:00 AM EST  
Blogger 2011bagnews said...

Cheap replica coach purses luggage for travelers. Strains appeared in front of replica Chanel handbags , The dtycxy0mcb hourglass ladylike silhouette is replica Gucci purses nothing new. sale Discount bags and handbags wholesale replica Gucci handbags , Goodbye to democracy and androgynous dressing replica Coach wallets fashion pendulum to the other direction. By ladylike, we mean a sense of decency and refinement mattered.It go back to
replica Coach handbags the time when manners and social skills is not to girly

Mon May 02, 04:34:00 AM EDT  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Moncler Outlet Store
Uggs clearance
Uggs on clearance
Uggs sale

Fri Nov 25, 04:07:00 AM EST  
Blogger Unknown said...

Someone who changes your life haoxiod81 just by being part of it.
Cheap New Era Hats
New Era Fitted Hats
Wholesale Cheap Hats
Cheap Hats
Cheap NCAA Hats

Tue Apr 24, 10:56:00 PM EDT  
Blogger myslot said...

ลองเลยสล็อต xo เกมสล้อตออนไลน์ slotxo ที่ดีที่สุด

https://www.slotxd.com/slotxo

Fri Mar 20, 07:41:00 AM EDT  
Blogger lnwslot789 said...

หนังออนไลน์ ระดับ Premium ได้ที่ Doonung1234 ฟรี ระดับ 4K HD หลากหลายเรื่องมากมาย กับเรื่อง Zombieland : Double Tap ซอมบี้แลนด์ แก๊งซ่าส์ล่าล้างซอมบี้ (2019) [ Master iTunes ]

Thu Apr 09, 09:23:00 PM EDT  
Blogger olivia said...

คาสิโนสดที่ขาพนันเลือกเล่นเยอะที่สุดก็จำต้องเกมบาคาร่าแค่นั้น
ถ้าคุณเป็นขาพนันคนใหม่บางทีเนื้อหาหรือเกี่ยวกับความรู้ความเข้าใจของเกมพนันนั้นบางครั้งก็อาจจะน้อยอยู่ แต่ว่าพวกเราขอบอกเลยว่าในขณะนี้ ขาพนันคนใหม่สามารถที่จะเรียนผ่านออนไลน์ด้วยตัวเองได้แล้วว่าเกมพนันนั้นมีลักษณะเป็นยังไงบ้าง มีกี่แบบ มีแบบเกมคืออะไรบ้าง หรือมีการพนันเป็นเยี่ยงไร เพราะว่าเกมพนันแต่ละเกมนั้นมีความแตกต่างกัน เพราะการออกแบบที่ต่างกัน แต่ว่าสิ่งที่เช่นกันเป็นจุดประสงค์สำหรับการได้รับเงินที่ใช้ในการเดิมพันจากเกมนั่นเอง เมื่อเป็นแบบนี้ ในตอนนี้ขาพนันขาพนันจะมองเห็นได้ว่าขาพนันจำนวนมากก็ชอบหาแนวทางที่ทำให้ตัวเองนั้นได้กำไรจากเกมพนันสูงที่สุด อย่าง บาคาร่าเองก็เป็นเกมพนันเกมหนึ่งที่เป็นคาสิโนสด รวมทั้งคาสิโนสดเป็นอะไร พวกเราจะขอมาชี้แจงกันถัดไป
คาสิโนสดที่ขาพนันมองเห็นบรรยากาศบ่อนอย่างเห็นได้ชัดก็จำต้องเกมบาคาร่า
เกมบาคาร่า แม้ผู้ที่เคยเล่นรวมทั้งจะต้องทราบว่าเป็นเกมที่มีบรรยากาศรอบๆก็คือ บรรยากาศของบ่อนคาสิโนในที่ที่นั้นจริงๆซึ่งบางบุคคลก็จะเรียกว่าคาสิโนสดนั่นเอง เนื่องจากว่าเป็นการถ่ายทอดสดจากสถานที่นั้นจริงๆแล้วก็ขณะที่ถ่ายทอดสดก็เวลานั้นจริงๆสิ่งเดียวกัน และไม่มีการบันทึกการพนันบาคาร่ามาก่อน เลย ซึ่งขาพนันก็จะรู้ดีว่าเมื่อขาพนันเองชนะเงินที่ใช้ในการเดิมพันขึ้นมายอดเงินที่เข้ามาในบัญชีนั้นก็เข้าจริงในช่วงเวลานั้นๆเลย
เกมบาคาร่าหมายถึงเกมพนันที่ได้เงินจริงจ่ายจริงในตอนที่เล่น
ตามที่พวกเราบอกแล้วว่าเกมบาคาร่านั้นเป็นคาสิโนสดที่ถ่ายทอดสดบรรยากาศนั้นจริงๆไม่มีการ make หรือสร้างขึ้นมาเพื่อหลอกลวงขาพนันได้เลย ด้วยเหตุว่าเมื่อขาพนันชนะพนันในแต่ละครั้งนั้นแล้วเงินปริมาณที่ขาพนันชนะพนันจริงๆก็จะเข้าสู่กระเป๋าบัญชีขาพนันเลยในทันที เพราะฉะนั้น ถ้าขาพนันอยากได้ถอนก็เสามารถที่จะถอนได้ตลอดเวลาเลย แล้วก็ขาพนันก็ได้เงินที่ได้จากการเล่นพนันในเกมบาคาร่าจริงๆด้วย ซึ่งชี้ให้เห็นว่าทางเว็บไซต์มีความั่นอาจจะด้านการเงินอย่างยิ่ง
จากที่มองเห็นก็จะรู้ดีว่าเกมบาคาร่าออนไลน์เป็นเกมพนันที่ได้มีการเข้าระบบ sa แล้ว ด้วยเหตุนี้ ขาพนันจะมีความเห็นว่าเว็บพนันออนไลน์โดยมากก็จะมีการเก็บเกมพนันต่างๆไว้ภายในเว็บไซต์พนันเว็บไซต์เดียวเลย รวมทั้งไม่ใช่เพียงแต่เกมบาคาร่าแค่นั้นที่เป็นคาสิโนสด แม้กระนั้นยังมีเกมรูเล็ตและก็เกมไฮโลที่เป็นเกมพนันคาสิโนสดเหมือนกัน

Thu Jul 23, 05:31:00 AM EDT  
Blogger michael obafemi said...

เติมเงินง่าย เล่นได้ทุกเว็บ ต้องนี้เลย slotxo เว็บนี้เว็บเดียวจบ Wow!!

Mon Aug 24, 12:54:00 AM EDT  
Anonymous SLOTXO said...

about info ECONOMICS click slotxo

Mon Sep 07, 05:00:00 AM EDT  
Blogger nntfunny said...

Thanking for sharing Effective article. Please follow my portfolio. click here slotxo

Tue Sep 15, 05:46:00 AM EDT  
Blogger Mr.slot said...

Not sure if I understand correctly. Give it a try >> slotxo

Tue Sep 22, 02:51:00 AM EDT  
Blogger nntfunny said...

wow!! I really like very. I hope you can visit and comment on my website ---> pgslot
ข่าวสด

Mon Nov 02, 03:53:00 AM EST  
Blogger sam1234 said...

ohoh!! I hope you can comment on my website :) pgslot
ข่าวสด

Mon Nov 09, 03:55:00 AM EST  
Blogger jantaslot said...

เล่นเกมแล้วได้เงิน สล็อตออนไลน์ slotxo เล่นง่ายๆ เล่นสล็อต ฟรีเครดิต slotxo
ได้เงินจริง เล่นเลยที่นี่ คลิกเลย เกมยิงปลา อย่าพลาดมาลุ้นกันเลย slotxo
https://www.slot4u.com

Thu Feb 18, 02:50:00 AM EST  

Post a Comment

<< Home