Monday, June 05, 2006

J. Bradford DeLete

One of the privileges of having my own blog is that I get to re-post the comments that Brad DeLong deletes. As everyone knows, he is quite trigger-happy with that delete button. Well, I can kind of understand: his threads would go on for miles of drivel if he let every Tom, Dick, and Harry post comments. But moi...? For my latest, first some background:

1. Brad attacks a political reporter for making light of Hillary Clinton’s “wonkish” energy proposals. The media should cater instead to careful and concerned readers who really care about her speech.

2. Brad attacks another reporter for not stating prominently enough that global warming skeptics are liars, lunatics, and charlatans. The media should cater to careless and sloppy readers, who will be more influenced by the skeptics’ statements than by the author’s unambiguous but subtle challenges.

3. More of the above: the post on which I commented.

So…

Will the real Brad DeLong please stand up? Is it the one who believes readers are dumb and casual and need to be spoon-fed the truth about global warming? Or is it the one who believes readers are subtle and sophisticated and need to be given more substantive details about Hillary Clinton’s energy proposals?


Oops, I forgot: It’s the one who deletes posts from those who find problems with what he says. I suppose one might be able to avoid this fate by stating the criticisms in unusually diplomatic language, instead of trying to be witty. But isn’t Brad himself the one who is always attacking reporters for being too diplomatic in their criticisms?

My latest comment agrees with something he said, though, so I’m guessing it won’t be deleted. (To be fair, I did make some mildly hostile comments on the first post cited above, and Brad didn’t delete them either. I guess it’s hard to predict.)

Labels: , , ,

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Knzn, Im appalled by DeLongs antics. AS I mentioned to you before, he did that to almost every comment I ever put there. And Ive never put any there since. Why would I? Once, I was in a debate with his readers and my comment just vanished. Thing is, I thought it was even insulting to his readers since they had all *referred* to my comment when they made theirs. It was completely shameless of him; he made no secret of deleting it. And, further, the comment was very respectful. I would never, ever, put an abusive or obscene comment anywhere. It was all the more galling since he claims his site is "fair and balanced"; and based at the home of free speech. I said this before to you, but his deletion was a signal to me that this guy was a fraud. Such hypocrisy to claim the media is biased when he himself is shamelessly so. Could you imagine if this guy was in public office?

Its also disturbing that the comments are deleted so quickly. Hes clearly continually scouring the comments; is this what the Cal taxpayer is paying him to do. Huh.

If you google "catallarchy delong comment" theres a posting about delongs deleting by some other blogger, catallarchy.


"But isn’t Brad himself the one who is always attacking reporters for being too diplomatic in their criticisms?"
And is also does so in a very abrasive, undiplomatic way. Like crowing about the "Stupidist Man Alive" etc.


"and Brad didn’t delete them either. I guess it’s hard to predict"
Well, idea is, if theres a large chance he will, say a prob of .8, whyd you post in the first instance. The marginal gain of posting is pretty low in the first place, right? Thats how I feel. I think many people have exp this (like I) and have just vanished from his blog. So in time, his comments will be completely biased. Im disgusted with this fatuous fraud.

Tue Jun 06, 10:32:00 AM EDT  
Blogger Unknown said...

I'm glad you have a blog - some of the better comments around are from you. I always worry you will catch me in some dumb error (again...)!

Have you on the blogroll, RSS, and will keep an eye out for good stuff that is sure to show up here.

Tue Jun 06, 09:08:00 PM EDT  
Blogger knzn said...

Well, I admit it wasn’t my best comment, but I still think there’s some substance to it. The demands are not inconsistent, but the rationales for the demands are inconsistent, at least as applied to those particular articles. In the global warming story, even a moderately careful reader could tell that the opinions in question were those of cranks (at least in the judgment of the author). The reason it was ostensibly necessary to be more obvious about it was that most readers are not even moderately careful. If those are the types of readers one is to expect, one cannot reasonably expect them to care about policy details. (Brad might say “substance” rather than “policy details,” but he’s being a little unfair there. In general, it is possible to be substantive on a less detailed level, but in regard to that particular Clinton speech, I think it would have been quite difficult to give a substantive report without dealing with details. In that respect, the fault is more in the way the senator organized her speech rather than in the reporting of it.)

Wed Jun 07, 12:03:00 AM EDT  
Blogger knzn said...

Perhaps you have uncovered the true Brad DeLong. But I think that true Brad doesn’t have much of a case against Joshua Green. How can we reasonably require journalists to care about things that their readers don’t care about (or won’t pay attention to)? His article gives the flavor or Mrs. Clinton’s speech, which is all most readers would want.

Speaking for myself, I am an economist and as such someone who presumably ought to be more interested in policy than the average reader. I’m not an energy expert, but I am someone who thinks about energy issues from an economic point of view. But I start to drift off when James Hamilton (or one of his commentators) starts going into the technological details of what energy sources are feasible. For the reporters that I read, I don’t care if they were willing or able to follow Mrs. Clinton’s discussion, and I don’t want to hear about which particular alternative energy sources she wants to subsidize. The important fact about the speech, from my point of view, is that it did contain an uncomfortable amount of detail. That’s not necessarily a negative in my opinion of the senator, but I’ll leave the details to the energy wonks.

Wed Jun 07, 05:46:00 AM EDT  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

酒店喝酒,禮服店,酒店小姐,酒店領檯,便服店,鋼琴酒吧,酒店兼職,酒店兼差,酒店打工,伴唱小姐,暑假打工,酒店上班,酒店兼職,ktv酒店,酒店,酒店公關,酒店兼差,酒店上班,酒店打工,禮服酒店,禮服店,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,暑假打工,酒店經紀,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒假打工,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,暑假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒假打工,酒店小姐,台北酒店,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,暑假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,寒假打工,酒店小姐,禮服店 ,酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,暑假打工,酒店小姐,酒店傳播,酒店經紀人,酒店,酒店,酒店,酒店 ,禮服店 , 酒店小姐,酒店經紀,酒店兼差,暑假打工,招待所,酒店小姐,酒店兼差,寒假打工,酒店上班,暑假打工,酒店公關,酒店兼職,禮服店 , 酒店小姐 ,酒店經紀 ,酒店兼差,暑假打工,酒店,酒店,酒店經紀,酒店領檯 ,禮服店 ,酒店小姐 ,酒店經紀 ,酒店兼差,暑假打工, 酒店上班,禮服店 ,酒店小姐 ,酒店經紀 ,酒店兼差,暑假打工, 酒店上班,禮服店 ,酒店小姐 ,酒店經紀 ,酒店兼差,暑假打工, 酒店上班,酒店經紀,酒店經紀,酒店經紀

Tue Apr 21, 07:24:00 PM EDT  
Blogger janewangleilei said...

wholesale air jordan shoes
wholesale fashion sunglass
wholesale converse shoes
wholesale puma shoes
nike ajf shoes
nike ajf1 shoes
nike ajf4 shoes
nike ajf5 shoes
nike ajf6 shoes
nike ajf9 shoes
nike ajf12 shoes

Thu Mar 25, 09:49:00 PM EDT  
Blogger oakleyses said...

ray ban sunglasses, cheap uggs, uggs, michael kors outlet, ray ban sunglasses, michael kors outlet, prada handbags, ugg boots clearance, oakley sunglasses cheap, longchamp handbags, air max, michael kors outlet, jordan shoes, polo ralph lauren, gucci outlet, christian louboutin, replica watches, louboutin shoes, louis vuitton, ray ban sunglasses, polo ralph lauren outlet, kate spade outlet, burberry outlet, tiffany and co, louis vuitton outlet, louboutin, nike shoes, oakley sunglasses, air max, uggs outlet, cheap oakley sunglasses, tory burch outlet, louis vuitton handbags, ugg outlet, longchamp handbags, louboutin outlet, rolex watches, michael kors outlet, michael kors outlet online sale, burberry outlet, louis vuitton outlet stores, prada outlet, tiffany and co, oakley sunglasses, chanel handbags, longchamp outlet

Wed Mar 02, 10:57:00 PM EST  
Blogger oakleyses said...

michael kors, air max pas cher, kate spade handbags, longchamp, true religion outlet, nike free pas cher, ralph lauren, abercrombie and fitch, coach purses, lululemon outlet online, sac burberry, louboutin, air jordan, nike air max, sac longchamp pas cher, timberland, nike roshe run pas cher, coach outlet, nike roshe, air max, true religion jeans, nike free, nike tn, polo ralph lauren, nike blazer, replica handbags, polo lacoste, oakley pas cher, ray ban sunglasses, ray ban pas cher, vanessa bruno, hogan outlet, mulberry, converse pas cher, michael kors outlet, michael kors pas cher, vans pas cher, sac hermes, true religion outlet, coach outlet store online, hollister, true religion jeans, michael kors uk, air max, new balance pas cher, nike air force, sac guess, north face, north face, hollister

Wed Mar 02, 11:30:00 PM EST  
Blogger Unknown said...

www0728

jordans
ralph lauren uk
canada goose outlet
kate spade outlet online
cheap snapbacks
canada goose outlet
oakley sunglasses wholesale
coach outlet online
true religion outlet
ugg boots clearance







Sat Jul 28, 02:54:00 AM EDT  

Post a Comment

<< Home